Finally - a clear explanation

December 6, 2007 | Scott

Thanks for the concise analysis. I totally agree with you. Given that Time Warner has many channels that are available on demand, I could have easily subscribed to only watch the Cowboys versus Packers game.

I personally have no desire to watch the Arizona Fudgepackers versus the Minnesota Gamecocks or any of the other teams, nor do I give a tinkers darn about basketball, baseball, hockey or any other pansy ass sport where the players have gone on strike.

Let's hope the Legislature stays away from this and lets free commerce take its course. Given Governor Pretty Hair agendas I'm sure a bill that attempts to legislate cable channels will be vetoed.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <blockquote> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readble fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.