Home › Lincoln Properties: Talk to the Hand ›

Reply to comment

re: Lincoln Properties: Talk to the Hand

Submitted by chip on Thu, 21-Dec-2006 - 10:10 pm.

Mike - I agree that the onus is on RG4N to put forth a positive vision for the development. Paige Hill started that exploration at the City Council meeting last Thursday, albiet at a very general level. She showed slides of some of the sorts of development that would be received positively.

I think specifics will be forthcoming, but you have to give them time. The practical fact of the matter is that this group didn't even exist four weeks ago.

Lincoln Properties and Wal-Mart took over a year and the best they could come up with is, "Let's dump a crappy suburban big-box on the plot." At least give RG4N a few weeks to come up with something better.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <i> <b> <tt> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <blockquote> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i>
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readble fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.