Leave No Spammer Behind
Submitted by chip on Tue, 04-Feb-2003 - 5:56 pm
in
Link: Spam Composition
It's a delight to see somebody taking on one of the most troubling parts of the spam epidemic: that atrocious grammar! (thanks Justin)












Comments
Comments have been closed for this entry.
re: Leave No Spammer Behind
Don't you also mean "contacted" instead of contracted"? I mean, I've "contracted" some things, but I don't think I should talk about them in a family forum such as this.
re: Leave No Spammer Behind
I'm sure we can count on the FTC to make a forthright declaration on ways to improve spam grammar after its upcoming three-day workshop.